Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3025 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €79.73 vs €88.88
- Up to 11% better value when playing Control than Celeron G1610 - €0.4 vs €0.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |