Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €72.66 vs €73.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1610 - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74407 minutes ago
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
29.298486932599726%
Multi-Core
739
16.525044722719144%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
