Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 294 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 22% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1610 - 111 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €62.78 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74490 minutes ago
Buy for €62.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
69.04376012965965%
Multi-Core
739
32.144410613310136%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |