Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-3820 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-3820 is 294 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 7% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G1610 - 93 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €49.99 vs €88.88
- Up to 47% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G1610 - €0.54 vs €1.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |