Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 514 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €9.9 vs €88.88
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valheim than Celeron G1610 - €0.05 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€9.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |