Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 699 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - €19.0 vs €33.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - €0.16 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13905 minutes ago
Buy for €33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |