Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €19.0 vs €177.47
- Up to 88% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.12 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Celeron G1840 - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5612 minutes ago
Buy for €177.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5613 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |