Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €9.9 vs €160.27
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-12400F - €0.04 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1840 - 286 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Buy for €160.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |