Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €9.9 vs €178.48
- Up to 93% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 7 3700X - €0.1 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1840 - 117 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for €178.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |