Buy on Amazon
€49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 33% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - €49.99 vs €74.91
- Up to 32% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Pentium Gold G6405 - €0.25 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-3820 - 205 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
200
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80619I73820 Processore Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3820 (3,6GHz, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
67%
Price, €
€74.91
66%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 processor 4.1 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €74.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
