Buy on Amazon
€69.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 132 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-8300 - €69.02 vs €80.56
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - €0.52 vs €0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
