Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €80.56 vs €89.94
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.56 vs €0.59 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-8300 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |