Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8300 - €60.9 vs €80.56
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74090 minutes ago
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
