Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-8300 - 155 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8300 - €60.9 vs €80.56
- Up to 26% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-8300 - €0.39 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16829 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |