Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €80.56 vs €103.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-10100 - €0.66 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8300 - 142 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17011 minutes ago
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |