Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 14% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6400 - €60.9 vs €71.0
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 51 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 147 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74329 minutes ago
Buy for €71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
72.17391304347827%
Multi-Core
992
59.43678849610545%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |