Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3360 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than FX-8300 - 279 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-8300 - €78.8 vs €80.56
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8300 - €0.28 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15343 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |