Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8300 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8300 is 41 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - 91 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €80.56 vs €88.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - €0.89 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15271 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
