Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 652 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-2120 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610 - 156 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €61.99 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
85.02994011976048%
Multi-Core
739
71.40096618357488%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |