Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1654 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Core i3-2120 - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-2120 - €60.9 vs €61.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-2120 - €0.45 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2120 - 51 vs 65 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17846 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17846 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |