Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - €60.9 vs €77.34
- Up to 20% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-2600S - €0.24 vs €0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 0% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3900 - 260 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |