Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8300 - 199 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-8300 - €74.44 vs €80.56
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74166 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |