Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 477 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10105F - 181 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |