Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 141 days newer than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3400G - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €88.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.66646670665867%
Multi-Core
3619
27.175790343170387%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |