Buy on Amazon
€105.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Celeron G1840 - 170 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €19.0 vs €105.57
- Up to 81% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.12 vs €0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 53 vs 65 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Processori (4C / 8T, 6 MB di cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost) con scheda grafica Radeon RX Vega 11
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18857 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1840 Dual Core CPU (2.80GHz, 2MB Cache, 53W, Graphics, Virtualization Technology, Socket 1150)
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18856 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
