Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1449 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - €19.0 vs €84.44
- Up to 76% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.06 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1840 - 341 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8523 minutes ago
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |