Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 580 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 341 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - €82.24 vs €84.44
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12836 minutes ago
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Athlon |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |