Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-12100F

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-12100F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

3.4 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
AMD YD2600BBAFBOX Processore Ryzen 5 2600 Socket AM4 3.9Ghz Max Boost, 3,4Ghz Base+19MB

Buy for 84.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-12100F

3.3 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-12100F Logo
Intel® Core™ i3-12100F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 12M, fino a 4,30 GHz

Buy for 97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

3.4 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
AMD YD2600BBAFBOX Processore Ryzen 5 2600 Socket AM4 3.9Ghz Max Boost, 3,4Ghz Base+19MB

Buy for 84.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-12100F

3.3 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-12100F Logo
Intel® Core™ i3-12100F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 12M, fino a 4,30 GHz

Buy for 97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1377 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - €84.44 vs €97.0
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F

  • Performs up to 17% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2600 - 236 vs 202 FPS
  • Up to 2% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.41 vs €0.42 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
This is a free version of Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


FPS

202

85%

Value, €/FPS

€0.42/FPS

97%

Price, €

€84.44

100%

AMD YD2600BBAFBOX Processore Ryzen 5 2600 Socket AM4 3.9Ghz Max Boost, 3,4Ghz Base+19MB

Buy for 84.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

Intel Core i3-12100F Logo
Core i3-12100F

Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022


FPS

236

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.41/FPS

100%

Price, €

€97

87%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i3-12100F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 12M, fino a 4,30 GHz

Buy for 97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 12685 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018

Intel Core i3-12100F Logo
Core i3-12100F

Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1152

51%

Multi-Core

4841

64%

Intel Core i3-12100F Logo
Core i3-12100F

Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022


Single-Core

2225

100%

Multi-Core

7457

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs
Intel Core i3-12100F Logo

Intel Core i3-12100F

Apr 19th, 2018Release Date
Jan 25th, 2022
Ryzen 5CollectionCore i3
Pinnacle RidgeCodenameAlder Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores4
12
Threads8
3.4 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.3 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz
65 WTDP
58 W
12 nmProcess Size
10 nm
34.0x
Multiplier33.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Ryzen 5 2600 or Core i3-12100F

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition, 1920 x 1080, Highest

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.