Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1377 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - €84.44 vs €97.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2600 - 236 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.41 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12685 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |