Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 75 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - €105.57 vs €128.88
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-9100F - €0.41 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 3400G - 266 vs 258 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
258
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4566 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
85%
Price, €
€128.88
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |