Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2151 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-4670K - 217 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - €109.7 vs €128.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i3-9100F - €0.51 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
86%
Price, €
€128.88
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
214
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |