Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-2120 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-2120 is 611 days older than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than FX-8300 - 151 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-8300 - €61.99 vs €80.56
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8300 - €0.41 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15740 minutes ago
Core i3-2120
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-2120
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-2120
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
