Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 602 days newer than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
64.36712657468506%
Multi-Core
3027
22.730344672223474%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
