Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €20.16 vs €153.91
- Up to 82% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.12 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 44% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G1620 - 237 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
165
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
18%
Price, €
€153.91
13%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600KF 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600KF
Buy for €153.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
