Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - 121 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8350 - €148.97 vs €155.88
- Up to 28% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - €1.23 vs €1.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58174 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
75.20661157024794%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
71.9298245614035%
Price, €
€155.88
95%
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |