Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2146 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - €20.16 vs €186.57
- Up to 88% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-9500 - €0.17 vs €1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1620 - 133 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for €186.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |