Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €20.16 vs €118.58
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770 - €0.05 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1620 - 469 vs 439 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
439
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Buy for €118.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |