Buy on Amazon
€106.72
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G1620 - 219 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Tray 60 Units
Buy for €106.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
28.168044077134986%
Multi-Core
723
15.48511458556436%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
