Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1711 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €20.16 vs €311.42
- Up to 93% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.12 vs €1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1620 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
6%
Price, €
€311.42
6%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €311.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
