Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 179 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €267.72 vs €379.64
- Up to 47% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.5 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
74%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
52%
Price, €
€379.64
70%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15992 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€267.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €267.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15991 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |