Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 1983 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 229 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €363.7 vs €379.64
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.59 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
84%
Price, €
€379.64
95%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13447 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €363.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |