Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i5-4670T - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €288.0 vs €379.64
- Up to 22% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €2.23 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
78%
Price, €
€379.64
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13436 minutes ago
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |