Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €288.0 vs €314.9
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-4670T - 267 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-4670T - €1.18 vs €1.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 20 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17705 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314.9
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |