Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i7-10700 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €257.33 vs €299.26
- Up to 12% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - €2.34 vs €2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
87%
Price, €
€299.26
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
98%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€257.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €257.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |