Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Celeron G1620

2.7 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

4.4 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor, bis zu 5.6GHz

Buy for 406.37 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G1620

2.7 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

4.4 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor, bis zu 5.6GHz

Buy for 406.37 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620

  • Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €20.16 vs €406.37
  • Up to 88% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €0.09 vs €0.72 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

  • Performs up to 147% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1620 - 565 vs 229 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Counter-Strike 2.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

229

40%

Value, €/FPS

€0.09/FPS

100%

Price, €

€20.16

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155

Buy for 20.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

565

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.72/FPS

12%

Price, €

€406.37

4%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor, bis zu 5.6GHz

Buy for 406.37 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 260 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

409

14%

Multi-Core

723

4%

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2822

100%

Multi-Core

17479

100%

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo

Intel Celeron G1620

vs
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
CeleronCollectionRyzen 9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRaphael
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM5
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
12
2Threads
24
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.4 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.6 GHz
55 W
TDP120 W
22 nmProcess Size
5 nm
27.0xMultiplier
44.0x
Intel HDIntegrated GraphicsRadeon Graphics
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G1620 or Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Counter-Strike 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.