Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €20.16 vs €399.51
- Up to 92% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-14700KF - €0.19 vs €2.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1620 - 164 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
107
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
7%
Price, €
€399.51
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |