Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €20.16 vs €275.06
- Up to 90% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-10700K - €0.13 vs €1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 38% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 209 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
152
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13922 minutes ago
Buy for €275.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |