Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €20.16 vs €227.27
- Up to 90% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13400 - €0.11 vs €1.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 216 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14327 minutes ago
Buy for €227.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |