Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - €20.16 vs €265.7
- Up to 92% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-9700 - €0.12 vs €1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G1620 - 173 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13893 minutes ago
Buy for €265.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13893 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |