Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2146 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €20.16 vs €209.12
- Up to 89% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-9600K - €0.03 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1620 - 744 vs 596 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
596
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19563 minutes ago
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |