Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 553 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen 3 3100 - 230 vs 226 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €107.6 vs €209.12
- Up to 47% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-9600K - €0.48 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
52%
Price, €
€209.12
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
226
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |