Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3694 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - €20.16 vs €195.12
- Up to 88% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 7600 - €0.1 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 15% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1620 - 244 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14312 minutes ago
Buy for €195.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |