Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €20.16 vs €210.7
- Up to 90% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-3770K - €0.19 vs €1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1620 - 113 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
105
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for €210.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |